South Africa’s robust junior miningsector is an investment attraction. (Image: MediaClubsouthafrica.com. Formore free photos, visit the image library) MEDIA CONTACTS • Mte SapukaDatabase Manager: Beta SolutionsNedbank Capital Global Markets+27 11 294 1340 or +27 83 650 1141 RELATED ARTICLES • Mines, headgear, and the mind • Mine houses bullish about Africa• Key economic sectors: mining • China-Africa relations to deepenTessa KrugerSouth Africa’s junior mining sector has proved its viability by surviving the market collapse and flight from high risk and illiquid investments of 2008.The continued vibrancy of the sector is evident in the fact that the Nedbank South African Junior Mining and Exploration Index, an instrument tracking the performance of junior miners operating in South Africa, has shown a slow but steady recovery since it dropped to an all-time low towards the end of 2008.Nerina Visser, quantative analyst of Nedbank Capital, says the incidents of junior mining companies going out of business when the global economic crisis hit the resources sector in 2008 can be likened to the shaking of bad apples from a tree.Although the crisis caused the junior mining sector to drop by nearly half, from 8% of listed mining companies on the JSE to 5%, this is not an indication of the viability of the sector.“A good number of companies are still around, there are many junior mining operations and corporate action taking place in the sector,” says Visser.Steady recoveryThe junior mining sector in South Africa was born of new legislation in the form of the Mining and Petroleum Resources Development Act of 2006. The Act enforced a “use it or lose it” principle, stipulating that mining rights not used by mining companies to exploit minerals in the ground would revert back to the state.The legislation gave rise to the development of the junior mining sector in South Africa. Unused mining rights held by mining groups, but not used for years, were awarded to newly established junior companies that often showed themselves to be true mining entrepreneurs.The advent of the legislation saw the launch of the Nedbank South Africa Junior Mining and Exploration Index in the same year, with the aim of raising the profile of the sector which had been dominated by certain major mining houses for more than a century.The dominance of the majors, including BHP Billiton, Anglo American, Impala Platinum, Anglogold Ashanti, Anglo Platinum, Goldfields, Sasol, Harmony and Kumba, is still reflected in the resources sector of the JSE. The top 13 companies by size constitute over 95% of the total market capitalisation of all listed mining companies.The Junior Mining and Exploration Index, comprising 38 mid- and small-cap miners such as Aquarius Platinum, Uranium One, Wesizwe, Platmin and Great Basin Gold, reached a market capitalisation high of R130 395 602 (about US$18.3-million) on 6 March 2008 and a low R43 555 730 (about $6.1-million) on 3 February 2009.However, the index has recovered from the low of 931.89 points on 21 November 2008, soaring to 1 602.28 on 15 September this year, which points to a steady recovery in the smaller sector.Visser adds that the high of R130-million reached in March 2008 could be construed as a “bubble” or overvaluation of the sector during that phase, as the rapid growth that took place from 2005 to early 2008 was spurred by an excessive risk appetite in the market and was essentially unsustainable.Interest from foreign investorsVisser says the viability of the junior mining sector is further underlined by interest from foreign investors who are showing increasing interest in all mining investments. The global financial crisis has also caused a sifting, leaving behind the more serious investor who is prepared for the long haul.“Many investors are looking at the Chinese and interpreting the fact that they are coming into Africa to exploit resources as a long-term uptrend for mining on the continent,” says Visser.The Nedbank Junior Mining and Exploration Index shows that the junior sector has delivered average annual returns of 4.2447% to investors since 2006. The returns exclude the performance of dual-listed companies, as South Africa’s exchange control regulations prohibit trade of derivative instruments over inward dual listed shares.In August 2010, the Index was made up of junior miners in platinum (44%), gold miners (16%), non-ferrous metals (3%), diamond companies (1%), coal (1%) and general mining groups (35%).The largest constituents of the Index by market capital include Aquarius Platinum, Uranium One , Assore, Northam Platinum, Great Basin Gold and Eastern Platinum. As the individual stories of the junior miners show, some of these companies have built value for shareholders by growing into successful producers of metals and minerals, while others became great takeover targets.African Mining IndexJunior mining is also a feature of the strong, continued move of the global mining sector into the African continent. Mining companies are moving into Africa through both organic and acquisitional growth, as the continent shows the best growth potential, says Visser.This investment trend has given rise to the Nedbank African Mining Indices, a series of ratings which measures the performance of energy, metals and mining producers who operate primarily in Africa. The series includes an index for junior producers in Africa.Visser says it was necessary to establish the African Mining Indices to tell the African mining story, as so many mining companies working on the continent are listed in Australia, London and Canada, because they need access to huge amounts of capital needed for their African operations.The Nedbank African Mining Index for All Commodities – Junior Producers has a 17% exposure to the JSE in terms of market capital, which compares well with a 30% exposure to the Toronto Stock Exchange, 31% exposure to the Australian Stock Exchange and 17% exposure to the London Stock Exchange.In terms of commodity exposure, gold leads at 27%, diversified mining follows at 23%, base metals at 19%, energy at 18%, platinum group metals at 6%, while other commodities make up 7% of the index.The returns of the index covering junior producers in Africa for the year to date stood at 5.2% in August.STYLE–> (Image: MediaClubsouthafrica.com. For more free photos, visit the image library)
Top Indian cricketers, who have been part of different teams of Indian Premier League (IPL), have objected to a clause in their contract with the respective franchises that denies them 20 per cent of their fees in case their team fails to finish among the top three.Gautam Gambhir was bought by Kolkata IPL team for Rs 11.04 cr. APThe clause has been introduced for season IV. As per the rule, if the teams fail to qualify for the Champions League (top three IPL teams make it to the international league), the players would get only 80 per cent of their fees.The players of the 10 IPL teams read the newly-introduced fine print in their contracts only after the January 8-9 auction. They collectively approached Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) president Shashank Manohar with their complaint last week.At the meeting, the players said that the clause was unfair, and a breach of their trust. Manohar assured them that the matter would be discussed at the IPL governing council meeting on February 4.However, the team owners insisted there was nothing unfair in the clause as the players’ payment was meant to be for both the IPL and the Champions League.The clause was part of the contract of only those players whose names figured during the auction. Uncapped players would get full payment regardless of how their teams do.